Article Surfing Archive

The Greek root of the word euthanasia is 'good death'. Some view the prospect of euthanasia as assisting in a merciful passing while others view the action as murder.

By definition euthanasia is an intentional act that either promotes death or omits care. Both actions result in the death of the individual under the supervision of a physician.

As of early 2008 there were only two countries that allowed euthanasia. Those countries were Belgium and the Netherlands. In the United States, Oregon was the first to consider and pass into law a bill dealing with physician-assisted euthanasia.

In the Netherlands it is estimated that roughly 2,000 individuals are euthanized each year, but there is also an indication that there are many instances that are not reported.

Anyone who has ever dealt with end of life issues for a loved one understands that it can be a very difficult time emotionally. It is hard to see your loved one suffer and it can become easy to have an altered view on the issue of mercy killing.

For some the issue centers on determining boundaries. What criteria are in place to help doctors determine if a patient is a suitable candidate for euthanasia? The belief seems to be that the issue can often be subject to abuse.

The debate originally centered on the aged and infirmed, but has expanded to include infants who may be mentally challenged or who suffer from extensive medical issues following birth. In the minds of some this issue is an extension of the arguments against abortion.

Some struggle with the idea of heroic measures often used by hospitals to forestall death in patients. There is a belief that these measures are taking the opportunity to die with dignity away from the patient. However, there are many cases that indicate these heroic measures have allowed many to continue to pursue life and enjoy family and friends for an extended period of time.

Life advocates indicate pain management has successfully allowed many patients to live in a way that allows more time with loved ones. Euthanasia proponents argue that the use of pain medications can leave patients confused and may bring on a form of dementia. They argue that this provides no additional quality of life to the patient.

Each argument seeks to demonstrate kindness to the individual life under consideration. Both attempt to project an image that demonstrates the strongest regard for the individual.

This scenario may have never been more pronounced that in the Terri Schiavo case. Terri collapsed in 1990 in cardiac arrest. The lack of oxygen resulted in significant brain damage. Terry was revived, but in a near comatose state. By 1998 her husband Michael asked that her feeding tube be removed. Terri's parents objected to this and a court battle ensued. By 2005 Michael's petition was granted and the feeding tube was removed. Without food and liquid Terri soon passed away.

Two divergent opinions about the care of an individual with long-term medical complications were expressed in the Schiavo case. Each point of view garnered supporting advocates. Each perspective appeared to have the best interest of the individual in mind.

Is euthanasia a matter of easing someone's long-term pain in the midst of his or her death? Or is euthanasia nothing more than the murder of someone who may not be able to speak for themselves?

This is one controversial issue that is often driven by multiple emotional factors.